找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethics in the Zhuangzi; Dialogues on the Sta Xiangnong Hu,Yong Huang Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Harding
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 16:50:11 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 21:45:17 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8182-0lutizes the Way as the source of value, which conflicts with Zhuangzi’s perspectivism. Third, the Daoist practical identity neither fits the Zhuangzian flexibility of identity nor explains the normative force by attuning to the Way.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:06:18 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:11:09 | 只看該作者
,Ethics and Normativity in ,: A Commentary on Jung Lee’s Ethics of Attunement,lutizes the Way as the source of value, which conflicts with Zhuangzi’s perspectivism. Third, the Daoist practical identity neither fits the Zhuangzian flexibility of identity nor explains the normative force by attuning to the Way.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:23:56 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:01:22 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 16:30:57 | 只看該作者
How , and , Can Shape a Plausible Zhuangist Ethics,veral aspects of my interpretation of a Zhuangist ethical outlook. Her discussion reveals several respects in which my previous treatments were insufficiently clear or precise. I am grateful for her meticulous critical appraisal, which highlights several dimensions along which I need to elaborate my proposed interpretation.
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:24:50 | 只看該作者
Introduction, Others, however, argue that it contains a rich ethical framework, emphasizing equality, self-cultivation, social harmony, and the exercise of prudence. This introduction offers an overview of this background and the current state of the field of Zhuangzi’s ethics, with the aim of demonstrating the
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 03:28:17 | 只看該作者
,How Is Zhuangzi Not a Relativist? A Critique of David Wong’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi as a Pluralere is no rational and universal justification for any morality, which requires us to take a relativistic stance toward different moral views, treating a plurality of moral views (but not necessarily all) as worthy of appreciation or, at least, tolerance. His . (1984a) is “the first book-length stud
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:22:12 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 20:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
始兴县| 师宗县| 黔西| 游戏| 泗洪县| 东明县| 米林县| 罗江县| 囊谦县| 仪征市| 莱西市| 庆云县| 彰化县| 裕民县| 晋江市| 岳普湖县| 弥勒县| 苍溪县| 甘孜县| 大荔县| 夏邑县| 河南省| 陆川县| 商都县| 关岭| 呼伦贝尔市| 芦溪县| 武邑县| 甘泉县| 宣武区| 安义县| 华池县| 崇礼县| 吴江市| 宜丰县| 和静县| 博客| 崇义县| 洪江市| 三亚市| 乐亭县|