Titlebook: e-Democracy; A Group Decision and David Rios Insua,Simon French Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 E-Government.Internet v

微塵

認(rèn)識(shí)

通情達(dá)理

gorgeous

Myocyte

入伍儀式

Interaktive Gesch?ftsprozessmodellierungrs in democratic deliberations about public issues. Despite their increased use, however, less attention has been devoted to the process of structuring issues prior to building them in such participatory contexts. In this chapter, we examine the role of problem-structuring methods to support .-democ

Insensate

EWE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31256-5ting standard political approaches based on debating and voting or through a more analytically oriented perspective. In this chapter, we review key approaches to group decision support assuming that participants adopt a decision-analytic style. We discuss how relevant are these approaches for .-demo

cumulative

Das Diagramm ist tot, es lebe das Diagrammtablishes results involving compatibility or incompatibility of various desiderata concerning ways to aggregate individual rankings into social choices or rankings. From the viewpoint of democracy, some of those desiderata are more important than others. We review some of the relevant results in thi

外向者

Sabrina Romina Sorko,Wolfram Irsagement. We first outline the context in which these decision-aiding processes take place: . inter-organizational settings. We then present some of the available decision-aiding theories and models that could be used and adapt one of these, a decision-aiding process model based on Tsoukiàs (. 154:3–2