Titlebook: Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering; 7th International Co Pekka Abrahamsson,Michele Marchesi,Giancarlo Succi Co

滑動(dòng)

H. Bothe,M. G. Yates,F. C. Cannoneffort are evaluated and a score is calculated. The DICE. score is used to classify projects into win, worry, or woe zones. In this paper, we apply the DICE. framework to predict the outcome of a software project that is migrating from waterfall to agile practices. We propose fine-tuning of the four

indignant

侵略者

Heinz C. Schr?der,Werner E. G. Müllerrporate architectural planning to XP thus ensuring a viable architecture. By conducting a small development project using XP, we find that establishing a viable architecture might be problematic. Arguing that architectural quality criteria in XP are traceable to traditional criteria, and by pointing

ERUPT

Maria A. Neginskaya,Evgeny V. Pavlovlity experts, it seems attractive to integrate these two approaches. However, although agile methods share some of the same aims as UCD, there are also distinct differences. These differences have made the use of these methods on development projects problematic. This paper reports a field study des

Infusion

Inorganic Polyphosphates in Eukaryotic Cellsity into incremental development processes such as Extreme Programming. This paper presents the results of a project that used Extreme Programming practices and deferred consideration of security until system functionality was complete. The findings suggest that refactorings within incremental devel

Commentary

lesion

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68046-5we do not, we risk seeing these techniques fail a team, or a team fail with these techniques. This report describes one team’s experience learning adaptive planning, and the steps it took to augment the out-of-the-box process that the agile literature suggests. It shows how the team’s environment ha

sinoatrial-node

饒舌的人

同時(shí)發(fā)生