Titlebook: Experts and Consensus in Social Science; Carlo Martini,Marcel Boumans Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Applyin

Ancillary

Struggling Over the Soul of Economics: Objectivity Versus Expertiseo (or, more precisely, ought to do following the traditional ideal). It is quite obvious, however, that making expert judgments more prominent alone won’t suffice. The right kind of expert judgment is needed. The chapter will therefore end with some thoughts about what a better economic expertise might look like.

預(yù)防注射

Validating Expert Judgment with the Classical Modeld and explained. A proposal for performing cross validation, based largely on the work of Eggstaff et al. (Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:72–82, 2014) is formulated and illustrated with data from recent expert judgment studies.

Suggestions

Introduction: Experts and Consensus in Social Science,ensus formation? And, is there a normative aspect to the formation of scientific and policy making consensus? The contributions of this book focus on experts: those institutional figures that act as a liaison between science and policy makers, politicians, governments, and other public domains.

輪流

The Institutional Economics of Stakeholder Consultation; How Experts Can Contribute to Reduce the Cofrom the Netherlands, provide guidelines for the effective institutional setup of such “matching zones”. Specifically, the design of a “matching zone” should try to adhere to the following principles: . there should be a common interest and ample incentives for reaching an agreement; . there should

Obituary

Explicating Ways of Consensus-Making in Science and Society: Distinguishing the Academic, the Interfpportunity (Solomon M, The social epistemology of NIH consensus conferences. In: Kincaid H, McKitrick J (ed) Establishing medical reality: methodological and metaphysical issues in philosophy of medicine. Springer, Dordrecht, 2007). Paying attention to the dynamics surrounding consensus, moreover, a

Invertebrate

Judgments About the Relevance of Evidence in the Context of Peer Disagreements and Practical Rationapproached in the recent literature. I believe that there is a difference between addressing the disagreement problem hypothetically, or in theory, as an abstraction of ., and regarding this same problem when it is considered from a . point of view, in consideration of features that characterize . ca

剝皮

Outspoken

演講

The Role of Experts in the Condominium Model as Republican (Re-) Solution of Social, Economic, and Pexperts. However, problems arise when one takes into account the variety of expert types, and especially the fact that not all of them fulfill the impartiality condition. This may pose some challenges to the condominium model. In this chapter I present and address those challenges.

headlong