Titlebook: Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice; Artur Appazov Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Expert evid

Collision

Basic Concepts of Decision Theory,onal and internationalised criminal tribunals, is a peculiar compromise between the special objectives of these international institutions and the domestic legal traditions upon which their procedural law is based. In contrast to the many other established systems of rules used on the international

Grandstand

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008787nternational Military Tribunal, the best known of the post-World War II military tribunals. After much debate, 24 defendants were selected to represent the Nazi diplomatic, economic, political, and military leadership. Robert Jackson, the American chief prosecutor at the IMT, decided to base his cas

CRAFT

Are Prevention Groups Therapeutic?,inal trials might already be available in national jurisdictions. They might not be as readily employed in these jurisdictions due to various historical reasons, but ideas stemming from the lessons learned still exist. As a procedural environment that was initially founded as a mixture of traditions

小木槌

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55900-9of its means of seeking fact, which follows from the nature of international political and legal structures. If national criminal justice systems receive their legitimacy from the unquestionable authority of the states themselves, international criminal justice is a product of a fragmentised, partic

Feckless

Oversee

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/319139.jpg

滲透

Introduction and Context,onal and internationalised criminal tribunals, is a peculiar compromise between the special objectives of these international institutions and the domestic legal traditions upon which their procedural law is based. In contrast to the many other established systems of rules used on the international

Audiometry

Expert Evidence in International Criminal Trials,nternational Military Tribunal, the best known of the post-World War II military tribunals. After much debate, 24 defendants were selected to represent the Nazi diplomatic, economic, political, and military leadership. Robert Jackson, the American chief prosecutor at the IMT, decided to base his cas

喪失

無畏