Titlebook: Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies; Matthew E. Benfer,Joseph L. Scheffey Book 2015 Fire Protection Research Foundation 2015 Building fi

作業(yè)

書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies年度引用




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluation of Fire Flow Methodologies讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

避開

dilute

Spartan

Summary and Conclusions, in general, based on decades-old criteria derived using data from actual fires. Over the years, building construction methods, building contents, and fire suppression equipment and tactics have changed. The overall objective of this study was to assess the appropriateness of currently available fir

GROWL

宿醉

宿醉

雄辯

Book 2015 the water supply requirements for firefighting including rate of flow, the residual pressure required at that flow, and the duration that is necessary to control a major fire in a specific structure. First reviewing existing fire flow calculation methodologies in the U.S. and globally, the authors

刪減

Introduction,of currently available fire flow methodologies. The first task was a literature review of the existing fire flow calculation methodologies in the US and globally. The second task was a data analysis and GAP assessment to determine what additional information is needed to validate the existing fire flow calculation methodologies.

OMIT