Titlebook: European Union Security Dynamics; In the New National Janne Haaland Matlary Book 2009 Janne Haaland Matlary 2009 European Union.France.UK.

hematuria

分發(fā)

annexation

Playing the Two-Level Game: France, Britain, Germanysovereignty in this field is influence. Through active participation and contributions a state carves out a place for itself because going it alone is no longer possible, even for great powers like Britain and France.

Arthr-

triptans

Coalitions of the Willing: The Pooling of Sovereignty in the ESDPterdependencies through their multinational cooperation? In the security and defence field, there is the ‘hardware’ question of military integration as well as the political issue of how free states remain in an international organisation like the EU or NATO. The EU is obviously much more close-knit than NATO.

chastise

Senescent

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11668-2ns. Hence, a . security and defence policy is emerging; both private actors and international organisations conduct military operations. We are in a transition phase in Europe, but it is clear that this represents a paradigm shift.

神經(jīng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17177-4iple, and who admits to military power only as a benign addition to other, nicer tools of statecraft. He or she will often have a rather teleological view of the EU as an alternative to the crass realism of US foreign policy, and will, as William Wallace remarks, be convinced of the moral superiority of the EU (Wallace, 2005).

事先無(wú)準(zhǔn)備

Concordance and Copulas: A Survey,er freedom in its dealings with the ESDP. Such a state does not incur the dependencies that smaller and weaker states do. In our analysis, we have seen that France and Britain are both global military players and strong states in security and defence policy, whereas Germany is extremely handicapped by its domestic politics.

過(guò)去分詞