找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: European Polyphony: Perspectives beyond East-West Confrontation; Ole W?ver (researcher, lectures),Pierre Lemaitre ( Book 1989 Palgrave Mac

[復制鏈接]
樓主: invigorating
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:08:04 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:04:42 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:50:57 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:06:52 | 只看該作者
The Future of Western European Security,satisfaction with existing defence policies has led to sustained mass campaigns against nuclear weapons in several countries. Opposition to Western Europe’s defence dependence on the United States has become deeper and more widespread since the 1979 triumph of the political right in the USA brought
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:15:27 | 只看該作者
The Security Debate in the Evangelical Church of the GDR,Nuclear Age’. for distribution exclusively to Church members. Its first section summarises the course of the Church debate on security issues from the mid-1970s to 1985 with impressive lucidity. The section concludes with a rejection of ‘the spirit, logic and practice of deterrence’.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:36:43 | 只看該作者
The New Peace Movement and European Security, of a European nuclear-free zone, and specifically, the non-deployment and later removal of the Euro-missiles. But the underlying concerns were more profound. They had to do with the role of the state in modern society and the issue of national self-determination. The Euro-missile issue, in particul
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:50:43 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:06:40 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:01:36 | 只看該作者
The Debate on European Security in the United Kingdom, overlapping arguments about defence policy, defence industries, Britain’s role in the world, and the future of political parties. Insofar as we can amalgamate these different debates into some sort of British ‘a(chǎn)pproach’ to European security, several contradictory trends are apparent. On the one han
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:35:21 | 只看該作者
European Security: Hungarian Interpretations, Perceptions and Foreign Policy,en ‘common’, ‘mutual’, ‘equal’, and ‘cooperative’ security, is effectively non-existent, whilst alternative notions such as non-offensive defence have yet to acquire real intellectual currency. Nor is there public discussion by the various social or political groups of alternative security policies.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 01:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
饶河县| 略阳县| 宜章县| 双牌县| 亚东县| 和政县| 呼和浩特市| 呼伦贝尔市| 南郑县| 建湖县| 东宁县| 八宿县| 永修县| 普安县| 浮梁县| 盐源县| 上犹县| 蓝田县| 灌云县| 华宁县| 朔州市| 分宜县| 元阳县| 筠连县| 永和县| 鄂州市| 蒲城县| 灌云县| 吉安县| 临颍县| 临汾市| 徐州市| 安吉县| 鲁山县| 修文县| 文山县| 曲周县| 松原市| 临泉县| 余姚市| 龙海市|