找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: European Philosophy of Science - Philosophy of Science in Europe and the Viennese Heritage; Maria Carla Galavotti,Elisabeth Nemeth,Friedri

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: ACE313
51#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 11:29:28 | 只看該作者
Martin A. Ciesielski,Thomas SchutzSome philosophers of biology argue that laws or principles in biology are nonempirical, but a priori or analytical, mentioning the Hardy-Weinberg law as an example.
52#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 13:02:11 | 只看該作者
Digitale Führungsintelligenz: "Adapt to win"In 1930 Otto Neurath asked Alfred Tarski for information about Polish philosophers of science and their work. Tarski answered on 24 April, 1930, saying in one of the first sentences (see Tarski 1992, p. 31) that:
53#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 19:19:33 | 只看該作者
54#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 00:17:50 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55622-7In this paper I am going to examine Kelsen’s legal positivism in the light of Nazilegal theory. My claim will be that Kelsen’s thesis that law and morality constitute two distinct normative spheres is highly plausible, but that some of his metaethical assumptions are seriously flawed.
55#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 02:13:43 | 只看該作者
Folgen auf Ebene der Finanzverwaltung,The program of logical positivism gave inspiration to the unity of science movement. The movement carried the belief that all sciences, including the social sciences and the humanities, ought to share some common language if these disciplines were to be considered genuine sciences (.).
56#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 08:19:41 | 只看該作者
57#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 12:14:16 | 只看該作者
Kazimierz Twardowski and the Development of Philosophy of Science in Poland,In 1930 Otto Neurath asked Alfred Tarski for information about Polish philosophers of science and their work. Tarski answered on 24 April, 1930, saying in one of the first sentences (see Tarski 1992, p. 31) that:
58#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 13:44:04 | 只看該作者
59#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 18:48:35 | 只看該作者
,Kelsen’s Legal Positivism and the Challenge of Nazi Law,In this paper I am going to examine Kelsen’s legal positivism in the light of Nazilegal theory. My claim will be that Kelsen’s thesis that law and morality constitute two distinct normative spheres is highly plausible, but that some of his metaethical assumptions are seriously flawed.
60#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 21:54:20 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 02:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
东兴市| 昭平县| 土默特左旗| 洛浦县| 马龙县| 连州市| 肇州县| 会泽县| 麟游县| 岱山县| 方正县| 莫力| 蓬安县| 孙吴县| 台东市| 香格里拉县| 凤庆县| 任丘市| 夏河县| 常宁市| 怀安县| 清远市| 西藏| 双鸭山市| 延长县| 永和县| 陇川县| 丰宁| 城市| 新沂市| 贡觉县| 枣强县| 茌平县| 通江县| 景谷| 化隆| 嘉峪关市| 灵丘县| 南乐县| 临夏市| 石楼县|