找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences; Seumas Miller,Michael J. Selgelid Book 2008 Sp

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 33338|回復(fù): 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:44:41 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences
編輯Seumas Miller,Michael J. Selgelid
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/316/315949/315949.mp4
概述Addresses a topic of tremendous contemporary importance.Addresses controversial topics such as biological weapons, academic/scientific freedom, and censorship.The dual-use dilemma is undoubtedly one o
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences;  Seumas Miller,Michael J. Selgelid Book 2008 Sp
描述What Is the Dual-Use Dilemma? The so-called “dual-use dilemma” arises in the context of research in the biological and other sciences as a consequence of the fact that one and the same piece of sci- tific research sometimes has the potential to be used for harm as well as for good. A dual-use dilemma is an ethical dilemma, and an ethical dilemma for the researcher (and for those who have the power or authority to assist or impede the researcher’s work, e. g. , governments). It is an ethical dilemma since it is about promoting good in the context of the potential for also causing harm, e. g. , the p- motion of health in the context of providing the wherewithal for the killing of in- cents. It is an ethical dilemma for the researcher not because he or she is aiming at anything other than a good outcome; typically, the researcher intends no harm, but only good. Rather, the dilemma arises for the researcher because of the potential actions of others. Malevolent non-researchers might steal dangerous biological agents produced by the researcher; alternatively, other researchers—or at least their governments or leadership—might use the results of the original researcher’s work for malevol
出版日期Book 2008
關(guān)鍵詞biological weapons; bioterrorism; censorship; dual-use; dual-use dilemma; ethics; science
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8312-9
isbn_softcover978-1-4020-8311-2
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-8312-9
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:40:43 | 只看該作者
Experiments of Concern,h as health and longevity. Moreover, human freedom, including freedom of intellectual inquiry, is agreed on all hands to be an intrinsic human good. Accordingly, there is a presumption in favour of allowing research in the biological sciences, as there is in other areas of human knowledge. In short,
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:23:52 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:02:41 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:48:49 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:30:25 | 只看該作者
om, and censorship.The dual-use dilemma is undoubtedly one oWhat Is the Dual-Use Dilemma? The so-called “dual-use dilemma” arises in the context of research in the biological and other sciences as a consequence of the fact that one and the same piece of sci- tific research sometimes has the potentia
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:49:46 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45315-5ve, and the advantages and disadvantages of each option are discussed in turn. Each option is complex in that it consists of six sub-options each of which pertains to one of the following six categories of decision.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:31:41 | 只看該作者
Options for the Regulation of Dual-Use Experiments and Information,ve, and the advantages and disadvantages of each option are discussed in turn. Each option is complex in that it consists of six sub-options each of which pertains to one of the following six categories of decision.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:52:08 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:31:24 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-22 12:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
安国市| 宁城县| SHOW| 东阳市| 伽师县| 葫芦岛市| 敦煌市| 增城市| 台南市| 靖远县| 扶绥县| 岳池县| 桑植县| 永康市| 南华县| 随州市| 宁都县| 敦煌市| 盐城市| 南投县| 潮安县| 南皮县| 西林县| 鄂尔多斯市| 河池市| 古浪县| 郎溪县| 卓尼县| 建湖县| 闽清县| 霸州市| 荥阳市| 平湖市| 上高县| 行唐县| 辽宁省| 琼海市| 靖江市| 西城区| 辉县市| 奉节县|