Titlebook: Epistemic Paternalism; A Defence Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 auto

商業(yè)上

Lectures on Mixing and Dynamical Systems,esearch. That said, those familiar with the relevant research, and on board with the idea that it gives us reason to think about how to develop ameliorative strategies in response to it, may skip ahead to Section 1.4.

少量

Why We Cannot Rely on Ourselves for Epistemic Improvement,esearch. That said, those familiar with the relevant research, and on board with the idea that it gives us reason to think about how to develop ameliorative strategies in response to it, may skip ahead to Section 1.4.

auxiliary

怕失去錢(qián)

Justifying Epistemic Paternalism,nalism. It also needs to be shown that there are situations in which we either are or would be justified in practising epistemic paternalism. In order to show that, however, we first need to say something about the conditions under which we are or would be justified in practicing such paternalism. That is the focus of this chapter.

勉勵(lì)

attenuate

Why We Cannot Rely on Ourselves for Epistemic Improvement,predictable tendencies to reason in ways that lead us to form inaccurate beliefs.. While probably well-worn territory for some philosophers, dwelling for a moment on exactly what does and does not follow from their studies, as well as from the many studies by other psychologists working on questions

forebear

調(diào)色板

predict

output

Justifying Epistemic Paternalism,o terms with the problems raised by our dual tendency for bias and overconfidence. In order to provide a . of epistemic paternalism, however, it is not sufficient to show that epistemic paternalism is a viable candidate, in that it is not the case that we are never justified in practising such pater