找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步，快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃，訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 19217|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:35:55 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy
編輯Ivan Cerovac
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/314/313302/313302.mp4
概述Builds an innovative structure than can be used to bring order to numerous accounts of epistemic democracy.Critically engages with the main theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice
描述.This compelling new book explores whether the ability of democratic procedures to produce correct outcomes increases the legitimacy of such political decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy, it additionally evaluates arguments for different democratic decision-making procedures related to aggregative and deliberative democracy...Addressing both positions that are too epistemic, such as Epistrocracy and Scholocracy, as well as those that are not epistemic enough, such as Pure Epistemic Proceduralism and Pragmatist Deliberative Democracy, Cerovac builds an innovative structure that can be used to bring order to numerous accounts of epistemic democracy. Introducing an appropriate account of epistemic democracy, Cerovac proceeds to analyse whether such epistemic value is better achieved through aggregative or deliberative procedures. .Drawing particularly on the work of David Estlund, and including a discussion on the implementation of the epistemic ideal to real world politics, this is a fascinating read for all those interested in democratic decision-making.? .
出版日期Book 2020
關(guān)鍵詞Epistemic justification; Democratic legitimacy; Experts; Truth; Decision-making; John Rawls; Political nih
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44602-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-44604-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-44602-4Series ISSN 2946-2738 Series E-ISSN 2946-2746
issn_series 2946-2738
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:03:20 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91174-3. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:34:01 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:29:24 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:59:42 | 只看該作者
The Knowledge Tenet,. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:40:39 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:39:07 | 只看該作者
Epistemic Democracy,legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:24:01 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:12:18 | 只看該作者
Book 2020 decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy, it additionally evaluates arguments for different democratic decision-making procedures related to aggregative and deliberative democracy...Addressing both positions that are too epistemic, such as Epistrocrac
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:36:27 | 只看該作者
System der Fett- und Wachsanalyse,stocracy, I demonstrate that scholocracy can be rejected as well, since it is not unreasonable to think that some epistemically damaging features (biases) might be present in the group that is given greater political authority. I end the chapter by claiming that the authority tenet should be rejected.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 15:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
松溪县| 磴口县| 桐梓县| 靖江市| 黄浦区| 汾阳市| 南京市| 大邑县| 长顺县| 烟台市| 襄樊市| 波密县| 新丰县| 金华市| 依安县| 唐海县| 万山特区| 甘泉县| 盈江县| 公安县| 建湖县| 陇西县| 文水县| 重庆市| 连云港市| 瓮安县| 抚远县| 富顺县| 修水县| 礼泉县| 宁都县| 康定县| 河津市| 娄底市| 汨罗市| 新安县| 南开区| 扎囊县| 鞍山市| 双鸭山市| 承德县|