找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Efficiency, Sustainability, and Justice to Future Generations; Klaus Mathis Book 2012 Springer Netherlands 2012 Adam Smith‘s Invisible Han

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Wilson
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 13:07:37 | 只看該作者
Klaus MathisCombines research from three disciplines: law, philosophy and economics.Covers the hot topics of climate change, sustainability, and eco-justice.Puts future generations at the forefront.Investigates t
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:30:09 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:42:43 | 只看該作者
Efficiency, Sustainability, and Justice to Future Generations978-94-007-1869-2Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:34:58 | 只看該作者
Adipositaschirurgie (Bariatrische Chirurgie)ent, the debate on consequentialism in legal adjudication is presented in detail, making particular reference to the situation in Germany, Switzerland and Anglo-American countries. By way of exemplification, the discussion moves on to consider the application of the Hand rule in tort liability.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:00:45 | 只看該作者
Consequentialism in Lawent, the debate on consequentialism in legal adjudication is presented in detail, making particular reference to the situation in Germany, Switzerland and Anglo-American countries. By way of exemplification, the discussion moves on to consider the application of the Hand rule in tort liability.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:37:31 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:56:36 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:29:46 | 只看該作者
Adipositaschirurgie (Bariatrische Chirurgie)ent, the debate on consequentialism in legal adjudication is presented in detail, making particular reference to the situation in Germany, Switzerland and Anglo-American countries. By way of exemplification, the discussion moves on to consider the application of the Hand rule in tort liability.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:23:30 | 只看該作者
Erkrankungen von Leber und Pankreasdiscussed in the literature but has not been ultimately solved. The present paper is a contribution to this ongoing discussion. The argument goes as follows. First, I will argue that insights from ., to the extent that they claim to be directly relevant for legal reasoning, should carry a jurisprude
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:28:15 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 23:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
华阴市| 漳平市| 墨玉县| 突泉县| 柏乡县| 盐亭县| 柳林县| 宁阳县| 安康市| 池州市| 长治市| 菏泽市| 高雄县| 丽水市| 牟定县| 土默特左旗| 阳江市| 余姚市| 阳江市| 内黄县| 芦溪县| 通海县| 宁晋县| 黑龙江省| 泸州市| 沾益县| 大姚县| 唐河县| 正安县| 平舆县| 腾冲县| 长宁县| 梧州市| 开江县| 韩城市| 乐山市| 巴南区| 利川市| 龙南县| 应用必备| 普定县|