找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Economic Justice; Philosophical and Le Helen M. Stacy,Win-Chiat Lee Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013 Economic Just

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 預(yù)兆前
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:48:17 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:55:13 | 只看該作者
Poverty, Markets, Justice: Why the Market Is the Only Cure for Povertyertain to fail to benefit the very people it is intended to benefit. Philanthropic assistance should be limited to disaster relief, such as tsunamis, where voluntary private help works brilliantly – and local governments impede it hugely.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:31:28 | 只看該作者
Some Remarks on Hume’s Account of Property Including One Cheer for the Communist Manifestodividualistic theory of society. The paper concludes with a discussion of the creative destruction (Schumpeter’s term) described by Marx and Engels as a basic characteristic of industrial capitalism. It ends by pointing out a basic error in Marx’s account that Hume had no difficulty avoiding.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:46:54 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:55:59 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:08:21 | 只看該作者
Baustellenmanagement im Anlagenbauing but value-neutral. The decision procedure is best suited to self-interested individuals determined to do as well for themselves as they can, and among its predictable results are certain character traits that are less than fully praiseworthy and economic inequalities that, given those traits, grow significantly worse as the process continues.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:59:00 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:16:11 | 只看該作者
Baustoffe für tragende Bauteilepen ended, content. Indeed, a strong argument for redistribution is that, unless property is qualified in such a way that it does not automatically rule out redistributive taxation, property cannot be defended.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:35:39 | 只看該作者
Economic Justice in the Oikos: Freedom and Equality in Family Law no injustice arises from differences in benefits. This holding is supported by the argument in this chapter that it makes sense to claim that drawing the distinction on the basis of marriage respects human dignity.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:15:15 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-21 06:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
昆山市| 台州市| 启东市| 汉阴县| 民丰县| 鄄城县| 佛冈县| 吴川市| 桦南县| 安西县| 德令哈市| 肥乡县| 辽阳县| 察雅县| 望江县| 台北市| 郴州市| 永靖县| 莱芜市| 黔西县| 肥乡县| 长子县| 中山市| 合山市| 宁陕县| 科技| 庆阳市| 旬阳县| 若羌县| 西充县| 北京市| 柳河县| 衡东县| 日喀则市| 临泉县| 松江区| 上林县| 项城市| 太康县| 沛县| 务川|