找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Eastern Europe in 1968; Responses to the Pra Kevin McDermott,Matthew Stibbe Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 解毒藥
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:44:29 | 只看該作者
,Ceau?escu’s Finest Hour? Memorialising Romanian Responses to the Warsaw Pact Invasion of Czechoslovus population backed the ‘patriotic’ anti-Russian stance of their young ruler, Nicolae Ceau?escu. He explores the resonance of the 1968 events in Romanian collective memory through twenty oral history interviews conducted in an ethnically-mixed rural settlement in western Romania. The invasion prove
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:34:20 | 只看該作者
,The ‘June Events’: The 1968 Student Protests in Yugoslavia,in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia were driven more by internal than external factors. As Morrison shows in this chapter, the grievances and demands of the students were framed in the context of Yugoslav social, economic and political developments of the 1960s. There was no real threat
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:47:54 | 只看該作者
,1968: The Prague Spring and the Albanian ‘Castle’, to formally withdraw Albania from the Warsaw Pact, was not so much an act of political courage by Enver Hoxha, but more a piece of political theatre. Lalaj provides two main reasons why the liberalising reforms in Prague did not penetrate this Balkan corner. One was the traditional isolationist pol
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:28:36 | 只看該作者
Echoes of the Prague Spring in the Soviet Baltic Republics,es in the Baltic States, the events of the Prague Spring had a Baltic echo. After purging ‘National Communists’ from the Estonian and Latvian Communist Parties in the 1950s, the authorities were ready to act against any sign of independent thinking and this propaganda offensive was by and large succ
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:39:47 | 只看該作者
,‘Down with Revisionism and Irredentism’: Soviet Moldavia and the Prague Spring, 1968–72,ed by Romanian leader Nicolae Ceau?escu’s hard-line stance against Moscow. In this chapter, Ca?u refines the conventional view. Based on archival documents, he shows that rural ethnic Romanians overwhelmingly endorsed the reforms in Czechoslovakia and Romania’s anti-invasion position in August 1968.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:56:55 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:30:20 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:25:54 | 只看該作者
,Ceau?escu’s Finest Hour? Memorialising Romanian Responses to the Warsaw Pact Invasion of Czechoslovs to be not as present in local memory as one would expect after reading the historians who have addressed the subject. Goina questions the claim that the 1968 events brought Ceau?escu’s communist regime broad popular support and suggests that this assumption could, and most probably should, be qualified.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 19:44:04 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:23:17 | 只看該作者
,1968: The Prague Spring and the Albanian ‘Castle’,icy of the Albanians, which the communists had perfected by the 1960s. Second was that in Tirana a series of party-sponsored ‘popular’ movements, some inspired by Mao’s Cultural Revolution, were at their peak. It seems that Hoxha was motivated by the vision of a society where everyone controls each other and the party controls everyone.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 10:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
哈巴河县| 灵山县| 宜君县| 仪征市| 广南县| 磐石市| 越西县| 含山县| 祁连县| 北碚区| 喀喇沁旗| 青海省| 凤山县| 宁波市| 瓦房店市| 红桥区| 铅山县| 河池市| 兰坪| 鄱阳县| 鲁山县| 望谟县| 科尔| 玛曲县| 阿图什市| 浦江县| 嵊泗县| 德安县| 卫辉市| 武夷山市| 汕头市| 荔浦县| 得荣县| 赤水市| 精河县| 基隆市| 新绛县| 镇宁| 阿拉尔市| 嘉禾县| 遂川县|