Titlebook: Disabling Romanticism; Michael Bradshaw Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 British Romanticism.Romantic Litera

surmount

Literary Disability Studieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/280815.jpg

Bereavement

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1833-4dies should be revisited in the light of contemporary disability awareness, but also that dominant critical practices associated with Romantic studies continue to marginalise and disable the different in body and mind. ‘Disabling’ Romanticism will involve interrogating certain traditions of interpre

撕裂皮肉

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1833-4esthetic appeal of deformity extended ‘picturesque’ criteria from landscapes and architecture to people. Uvedale Price wrote in 1794 that ‘Deformity is to ugliness what picturesque is to beauty; though distinct from it, and in many cases arising from opposite causes, it is often mistaken for it, oft

nonradioactive

神經(jīng)

凈禮

Christopher M. Schmidt,Susumu Kuroda, mentally ill, blind, and virtually deaf. To discuss the King at all in the difficult situation of a Regency was audacious, and reflects Southey’s strong identification with the King rather than the Regent. The focus is on Southey’s ., in which the stricken George III acquires the status of a natio

受人支配

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12719-0r actress and royal courtesan Mary ‘Perdita’ Robinson began to suffer from progressive lower-limb paralysis. Brewer examines the contemporary reception of Robinson’s impairment within the context of the Romantic-era debate about how disability should be responded to and interpreted. Robinson’s obitu

angiography

厭煩

synovium