找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Digital Whistleblowing Platforms in Journalism; Encrypting Leaks Philip Di Salvo Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Jejunum
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:15:55 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 04:15:48 | 只看該作者
The Future of Digital Whistleblowing,clearly defined phenomenon, structured around different elements: they can be operated by journalists, legacy and digital news outlets, as well as NGOs and watchdog or activist groups; can consider WikiLeaks similar to their work or consider their work completely different; and, finally, can conside
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:30:33 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:49:35 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:22:43 | 只看該作者
Whistleblowing Platforms,overview of the phenomenon in the post-WikiLeaks phase, by offering details about pioneering projects and their failures. SecureDrop and GlobaLeaks, the two most adopted software for whistleblowing platforms, are also presented. Moreover, whistleblowing platforms are also discussed in the context of
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:08:27 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:37:05 | 只看該作者
A Taxonomy of Whistleblowing Platforms,s offered, resulting from the study results. It consists of “publishing”, “collaborative”, “multistakeholder” and “media” platforms. The characteristics of each group are discussed in order to offer a description of how platforms operate and their principles and features. Later, answers to the other
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 05:17:33 | 只看該作者
WikiLeaks: An Inspiration, a Reference, a Model?,histleblowing in the digital age are critically assessed, in regard to particular platforms’ strengths and weaknesses. Finally, the limitations of the book are listed, together with potential further research developments for the future.
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:13:11 | 只看該作者
The Boundary Space Between Journalism and Activism,as definitely not a completely new issue, it gained new relevance in the wake of the NSA surveillance scandal. Snowden was the starting point for different public discussions among journalists, and one of these focused on balancing potential activists’ stances while conducting aggressive and adversa
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:43:51 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-2-6 13:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
阿合奇县| 东莞市| 石林| 武义县| 卓尼县| 桑植县| 潮安县| 祁连县| 乌兰县| 炉霍县| 富蕴县| 南昌市| 华阴市| 肥东县| 布尔津县| 龙里县| 清水县| 武冈市| 岗巴县| 岱山县| 富锦市| 巴楚县| 新竹市| 安国市| 克拉玛依市| 大关县| 唐海县| 民县| 修水县| 花莲县| 视频| 宁城县| 石景山区| 东平县| 淮阳县| 通化市| 桑日县| 班戈县| 渑池县| 花莲县| 郑州市|