Titlebook: DiaLaw; On Legal Justificati Arno R. Lodder Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 argumentation.Legal Justification.Prol

Agitated

書目名稱DiaLaw影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱DiaLaw影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱DiaLaw網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱DiaLaw網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱DiaLaw被引頻次




書目名稱DiaLaw被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱DiaLaw年度引用




書目名稱DiaLaw年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱DiaLaw讀者反饋




書目名稱DiaLaw讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

多骨

Obstacle

In conclusion,legal justification. Subsequently, the answers to the questions that were raised in the first chapter, and answered one by one in the course of this work, are summarized. Finally, the future use in legal practice of dialog models that represent argumentation in a natural way is discussed.

Ingredient

Suicide Among Justice-Involved Youthon. A few millennia later, from the beginning of the 1990s onwards to be exact, researchers involved in the field of AI & Law became interested in dialogical models of argumentation. By approaching argumentation dialogically the research on AI & Law followed in the footsteps of prominent researchers

偽證

voluble

voluble

Juvenile Crime Victims in the Justice Systemlegal justification. Subsequently, the answers to the questions that were raised in the first chapter, and answered one by one in the course of this work, are summarized. Finally, the future use in legal practice of dialog models that represent argumentation in a natural way is discussed.

驚呼

不可磨滅

RADE

David Finkelhor,Patricia Y. HashimaIn this chapter other dialogical models are described and compared to DiaLaw.. First, in section 1, of a wide range of dialogical models is briefly indicated for which purpose they were developed.