Titlebook: Design for Configuration; A Debate based on th Asko Riitahuhta,Antti Pulkkinen Conference proceedings 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelber

Bravura

Workshop Structure and Comments from Discussion framework is based on procedural view on Design for Configuration. Two other structures for the contents are presented. These are supposed to help the reader to link the papers to product structuring research and to each other.

Offset

鴕鳥

Amorous

云狀

crescendo

遣返回國(guó)

opalescence

Gourmet

Enhancing Product Modularisation with Multiple Views of Decomposition and Clusteringct data management systems. The method enables modelling product data hierarchies from several points of view and linking them together. It is argued that by searching optimal configuration ranges from different points of view optimum and combining them a company wide pareto-optimum can be found and

interlude

A Framework for Evaluating Commonalityen mentioned within this framework. However, commonality may occur at different levels of abstraction, commonality of functions or parts, and at different levels of detail, commonality of modules or parts. This paper presents a literature survey of related research on product families, product struc