Titlebook: Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings; Risto Hilpinen Book 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1971 deonti

大口水罐

書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings被引頻次




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings年度引用




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings讀者反饋




書目名稱Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

寬度

New Foundations for Ethical Theory,lly behave. There are also philosophers of a more convenient sort, who only wish to tell us something about ethical theories. The doctrines advocated by these three kinds of philosophers all belong to the wide domain of ethics, and they are easily confused. However, we shall try not to confuse them

圓錐

Foregery

admission

An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,] and [19]. The ‘paradoxes’ which arise in these logics seem to indicate that the axioms reflect only some special senses of the words ‘obligation’ and ‘permission’. I believe that the questions of what these special senses are can be clarified by exhibiting a simple picture of the formal structure

ATOPY

ATOPY

Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions*,otions of necessity, possibility, and impossibility on the one hand and the deontic or normative ideas of obligation (‘ought to’), permission (‘may’), and prohibition (‘must not’) on the other hand. In a broad sense, both groups of concepts can be called .; the members of the first group are sometim

可耕種

Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/265685.jpg

CHYME

Richard A. Harshman,Elizabeth Hampsoncience of morality”, and Ernst Mally [30] was the first to use the term — in the form . — to refer to logical study of the normative use of language. In accordance with Bolzano and Quine’s definition of logical truth, deontic logic can be defined as the study of those sentences in which only logical

搏斗