找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Democracy in Europe; A Political Philosop Daniel Innerarity Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 democracy in Eur

[復(fù)制鏈接]
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 13:21:53 | 只看該作者
Conclusion: What Can We Hope? European Promises After Its Crisis the stages of this symbolic tour through (1) furtive and mechanical Europe, (2) the remoteness of non-salient Europe, (3) the Europe that hopes and the Europe that fears, (4) headstrong Europe, which claims that crises are necessarily opportunities, and then (5), the Europe with which I identify th
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 13:59:41 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:22:20 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84925-0if we were unaware of the nature of our problems and, as logically follows, do not know who should take responsibility for their lack of resolution. The democratic deficit arose because the states have not managed to democratize their interdependence.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:36:17 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:45:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84925-0ere not such a solid group or did not need to be so? In that case, it may even be that European integration represents an opportunity to articulate unity and diversity in a manner that is more respectful of its internal plurality.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:06:36 | 只看該作者
Atte Oksanen,James E. Hawdon,Pekka R?s?nenurden that hinders us from doing so. The way we label current financial imbalances in the Eurozone is an eloquent illustration of how far we are from seeing ourselves as a common space of justice and solidarity.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:42:49 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:01:01 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:55:53 | 只看該作者
Whose Deficit? The European Democracy and Its Democraciesif we were unaware of the nature of our problems and, as logically follows, do not know who should take responsibility for their lack of resolution. The democratic deficit arose because the states have not managed to democratize their interdependence.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:14:03 | 只看該作者
What Should Be Democratized? The Peculiarity of Democracy in EuropeEU’s principal democratic innovations it is not possible to criticize its democratic weaknesses. As I will show, this lack of attention to the integration process is what makes certain attempts to exert national control over the democraticity of Communitarian decisions questionable.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-2-6 12:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
九江市| 汉阴县| 搜索| 宜都市| 池州市| 长海县| 合川市| 新蔡县| 定西市| 万荣县| 稷山县| 平昌县| 南涧| 博罗县| 太和县| 新田县| 棋牌| 莱芜市| 白水县| 义乌市| 越西县| 和政县| 康保县| 大渡口区| 华亭县| 神池县| 兖州市| 中西区| 祁阳县| 饶平县| 怀宁县| 渝北区| 曲阳县| 桃园县| 班戈县| 南投市| 壤塘县| 黔西县| 玉溪市| 东方市| 城口县|