找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Defeasible Deontic Logic; Donald Nute Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 artificial intelligence.deontic logic.intelligen

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: BOUT
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:31:07 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:08:36 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:27:41 | 只看該作者
Developments in East European PoliticsOne of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:52:25 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22898-0Since the publication of (Chisholm, 1963), deontic logicians have struggled with the problem of supplying an adequate formal characterisation of the distinction between primary obligations and those obligations — called “contrary—to—duty” by Chisholm — which come into force when some other obligation is violated.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:17:03 | 只看該作者
Dyadic Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duty Obligations,One of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:57:09 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:14:24 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86596-2 notions from normative reasoning, including the notions of . obligation, contrary-to-duty obligations, and moral dilemmas have raised serious problems for deontic logicians, problems which have defied solution within standard deontic logic and its extensions. As a result, deontic logic has fallen i
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:47:50 | 只看該作者
Nitzan Cohen,Emma Sicher,Se?il U?ur Yavuz argue in this paper, however, that, at least for certain purposes, the techniques recently developed within the field of nonmonotonic logic may provide a better theoretical framework for the formal study of normative reasoning than the usual modal treatment.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:26:30 | 只看該作者
Developments in Design Research and Practicedo A given B&C or one is permitted not to do A given B&C. In these cases the latter rules . the first one. We claim that most normative systems that are complex enough to guide actions in light of the fact that some rules have been violated will contain defeasible rules. For example, the Model Penal
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:01:00 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-30 18:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
莱芜市| 申扎县| 图片| 鹤庆县| 依兰县| 长子县| 罗甸县| 台东县| 泉州市| 本溪市| 肥西县| 郯城县| 郸城县| 高碑店市| 民丰县| 临澧县| 泽库县| 伊春市| 扬州市| 长宁县| 吉林市| 泰州市| 类乌齐县| 永城市| 兴和县| 鄱阳县| 九台市| 玉门市| 榆树市| 苏州市| 衢州市| 府谷县| 罗甸县| 清水河县| 海伦市| 皋兰县| 涞水县| 剑川县| 台东市| 营口市| 上虞市|