找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Defeasible Deontic Logic; Donald Nute Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 artificial intelligence.deontic logic.intelligen

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: BOUT
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:31:07 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:08:36 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:27:41 | 只看該作者
Developments in East European PoliticsOne of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:52:25 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22898-0Since the publication of (Chisholm, 1963), deontic logicians have struggled with the problem of supplying an adequate formal characterisation of the distinction between primary obligations and those obligations — called “contrary—to—duty” by Chisholm — which come into force when some other obligation is violated.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:17:03 | 只看該作者
Dyadic Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duty Obligations,One of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:57:09 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:14:24 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86596-2 notions from normative reasoning, including the notions of . obligation, contrary-to-duty obligations, and moral dilemmas have raised serious problems for deontic logicians, problems which have defied solution within standard deontic logic and its extensions. As a result, deontic logic has fallen i
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:47:50 | 只看該作者
Nitzan Cohen,Emma Sicher,Se?il U?ur Yavuz argue in this paper, however, that, at least for certain purposes, the techniques recently developed within the field of nonmonotonic logic may provide a better theoretical framework for the formal study of normative reasoning than the usual modal treatment.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:26:30 | 只看該作者
Developments in Design Research and Practicedo A given B&C or one is permitted not to do A given B&C. In these cases the latter rules . the first one. We claim that most normative systems that are complex enough to guide actions in light of the fact that some rules have been violated will contain defeasible rules. For example, the Model Penal
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:01:00 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-30 22:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
扎赉特旗| 桐乡市| 大渡口区| 拉萨市| 梅河口市| 望奎县| 舒兰市| 岳普湖县| 鞍山市| 祁连县| 乐陵市| 莱州市| 车险| 桑植县| 武乡县| 江门市| 绥中县| 襄汾县| 策勒县| 芦溪县| 出国| 富阳市| 中阳县| 龙江县| 临澧县| 轮台县| 柘荣县| 大渡口区| 贺州市| 长子县| 将乐县| 枝江市| 南投县| 溧阳市| 安阳市| 璧山县| 上高县| 临沭县| 临漳县| 庄河市| 江达县|