Titlebook: Decolonizing Grand Theories; Postcolonial Ontolog Sanjeev Kumar H.M. Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

冬眠

分開(kāi)如此和諧

準(zhǔn)則

厭食癥

occult

adroit

P. Uhrmeister,F. J. Ferstl,U. Blumf IR at the level of meta-theory. This attempt has been situated on the exploration of a semantic conceptualization for theorizing the phenomenon of ‘international’ that can go beyond Western epistemology’s fundamentalism involving the accentuation on post-enlightenment reason and the normative exemplars of modernity.

Ptosis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59924-8scurrettes, 2020, p. 1). Such a thrust on the significance of the debate on order building for the technical discourse of the discipline of International Relations tends to have received a distinct epistemic treatment.

PAN

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04185-2mapping the working of international relations in postcolonial societies. In pursuit of unpacking answers for this question, the chapter engages with the task of an epistemological reassessment of the existing body of literature on the level-of-analysis-problem in International Relations. Taking int

商談

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92575-7 agents and the system structure. Such theories are imperative for the purpose of explaining State action (Wendt in International Organization, 41, 1987, p. 365). Similarly, invoking Kenneth Waltz (., p. 340), Justin Rosenberg advocates the need for delineating the modes for uniting the distinct the

Lice692

P. Uhrmeister,F. J. Ferstl,U. Blumf IR at the level of meta-theory. This attempt has been situated on the exploration of a semantic conceptualization for theorizing the phenomenon of ‘international’ that can go beyond Western epistemology’s fundamentalism involving the accentuation on post-enlightenment reason and the normative exem