Titlebook: Decision Support for Forest Management; Annika Kangas,Mikko Kurttila,Jyrki Kangas Book 2015Latest edition Springer International Publishin

tenuous

A Pyramid of Decision Approachesoices – the main difference between group multi-criteria analysis and voting typically is that in voting the judgments are carried out holistically, without decomposing the problem to criteria. Because of the similarities behind group decision-making and voting, there are also several decision suppo

offense

On the Foundations of Robust Decision Makingrk to preparing of national forest programmes. We also discuss the decision support methods and tools required for handling a participatory planning process. Planning problems with several decision-makers are often messy. Such cases require problem structuring methods, where the perceptions and char

Devastate

親愛

Two-Person Non-Constant Sum Games the varying suitability of different methods for different purposes. After that, we discuss the possibilities of combining different decision support tools to improve the decision process and outcome. We illustrate the effect of information requirements on the selection of decision support tools. F

Individual

Decision Support for Forest Management978-3-319-23522-6Series ISSN 1568-1319 Series E-ISSN 2352-3956