找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debating Laws; Studies on Parliamen A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Enkephalin
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:05:50 | 只看該作者
Metafiktionalit?t im Bilderbuchhodologically, the analysis starts by reconstructing how social and legislative debates on gender violence evolved in Spain, i.e. how the social problem was forged in the public sphere and by the mass media, how the debate reached the legislative stage, and how the parliamentarians amended—or attemp
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:09:21 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:33:10 | 只看該作者
Das Bildschirmspiel im Alltag Jugendlicher. It can thus be a good starting point for a study of the rationality and justification of this piece of legislation (which originally stems from a citizen legislative initiative). The legislative deliberation on bullfighting in the Spanish Parliament does not reflect, as one might think ., a certai
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 18:08:34 | 只看該作者
Jürgen Reyer,Diana Franke-Meyerliamentary deliberation took place regarding the initially approved Royal Decree-Law and the bill negotiated in the Committee. This chapter uses the concept of rhetoric, as employed by Albert O. Hirschman, to review the distinct theses, recurring narratives, cliches, and metaphors utilized during th
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:50:09 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:11:01 | 只看該作者
Legislative Debates in Parliament as a Source of Statutory Justification: A Framework for Analysis e elected lawmakers. These criteria attempt to account for the ‘extent’ (the ‘scope’ and ‘depth’), the ‘structural correctness’, the ‘dialectical-deliberative adequacy’ (or ‘thoroughness’) and the ‘plausibility’ of the legislative justification that MPs offer during parliamentary debates on bills.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:15:06 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:26:43 | 只看該作者
Expelling, Discussing, and Throwing Values Out,pproach, I will discuss: the context of the parliamentary discourse on this measure, ranging from geopolitical issues to mass media spectacle; the institutional liturgy shared by all involved actors; the conditions of ‘veridiction’ in which this discourse operates; the nature of the power it sets in
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:05:40 | 只看該作者
Parliamentary Debates on Joint Custody Legislation,al effects, both for the interests of the child and for the equality between parents. The left-wing parties were opposed to or, at least, reluctant to the measure. However, for the first law the parliamentary procedure enabled a compromise on a text that was accepted by nearly the whole chamber. Thi
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:36:32 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 19:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
资阳市| 东宁县| 丁青县| 色达县| 胶州市| 江西省| 如皋市| 汪清县| 那坡县| 西充县| 邵阳市| 望都县| 通州市| 修武县| 洛浦县| 云浮市| 镶黄旗| 汶川县| 红河县| 南和县| 都江堰市| 台南市| 靖西县| 赫章县| 瑞昌市| 嘉黎县| 壶关县| 射洪县| 平利县| 邢台市| 兴化市| 宁强县| 湘乡市| 谢通门县| 集贤县| 蕉岭县| 花垣县| 西林县| 朝阳市| 乐陵市| 崇阳县|