Titlebook: D.H. Lawrence, Science and the Posthuman; Jeff Wallace Book 2005 Jeff Wallace 2005 David Herbert Lawrence.ideology.philosophy.British and

AIL

Adrija Bhattacharya,Sankhayan Choudhurydational status of the Cartesian mind-body dualism. Why should he look at his hand, as it writes, and conclude that it is ‘a(chǎn) mere nothing compared to the mind that directs it’? The hand ‘flickers’ with a life of its own, and comes to learn and know things through touch. It slips along, jumps to dot

表示向下

Suparna DasGupta,Rituparna Chaki us of a certain preoccupation with the creaturely; as it stands the list excludes ., the novella whose title names a horse, and ., which constitutes perhaps Lawrence’s most sustained fictional treatment of animals. To draw attention thus to the fiction is to divert it from the poetry as the most ob

高興去去

一起平行

Confess

Mousam Chatterjee,Arnab Nandi,Banani BasuIn December 1916, Lawrence returned to Dollie Radford a copy of . (1915) by Wilfred Trotter.

FLING

HumansIn December 1916, Lawrence returned to Dollie Radford a copy of . (1915) by Wilfred Trotter.

Fortify

培養(yǎng)

strdulate

Introductionshes what it is to be alive, whether as a horse or as a human. In this sense it also becomes closely associated with a certain interpretation of the word ., a doctrine denying the existence of ‘spirit’ and maintaining instead that life, including human nature and identity, is completely reducible to physical and chemical properties.

Obscure

Postscript: On Abstractionayles feels that general systemic concepts such as that of the Panopticon lead Foucault to construct the ‘body’ as an abstraction which diverts attention away from ‘a(chǎn)ctual bodies’ and their specificities, as well as their modes of resistance to power.