Titlebook: Cosmopolitanism, Self-Determination and Territory; Justice with Borders Oliviero Angeli Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmill

craving

Territorial Exclusion and Its Boundaries,lementation. The term ‘collective self-determination’ is used in contradistinction to national self-determination to refer to the citizens of a state with no distinction of cultural or religious affiliation. My understanding of collective self-determination is meant to be compatible with moral cosmopolitanism.

殺死

Introduction,uch of their relevance. Over the last few decades, a vast amount of scientific evidence has accumulated to support the idea that the Westphalian system with its emphasis on a state’s territoriality has come to an end (cf. Ruggie, 1993). Bertrand Badie has gone as far as to declare the ‘end of the te

CRP743

Genealogies of the Territorial State,odern Europe (not to mention other continents), however, . sovereignty was not as self-evident as it is today The territorial state still had its own peculiar rivals, such as the remnants of the late feudal system, with its loosening tissue of personal ties, the Church and the Holy Roman Empire, whi

collagenase

仔細(xì)檢查

Psa617

使成核

共同時(shí)代

Territorial Inclusion and Its Boundaries,ociety. But there is nothing sacrosanct about this ‘container view’ of legal inclusion. In principle, migration and territoriality can be disjointed (cf. Favell, 2007: 271). One could, for instance, imagine a world in which the act of crossing territorial borders did not turn people into immigrants

Agronomy

Territory and Natural Resources,his chapter (5.4), I will criticize the tendency of global egalitarianism to prioritize . resources as a tax base for global redistribution. My claim here will be that cosmopolitan egalitarians should deal with the whole set of external means that affect people’s capacity to pursue their ends, and n

死亡率