Titlebook: Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods; 11th IFIP WG 10.5 Ad Tiziana Margaria,Tom Melham Conference proceedings 2001 Springer-Ver

Confirm

flavonoids

碌碌之人

critique

Proof Engineering in the Large: Formal Verification of Pentium?4 Floating-Point Divider all micro-operations executing on the floating-point division and square root unit of the Intel IA-32 Pentium?4 microprocessor. The verification methodology is based on combining human-guided mechanised theorem-proving with low-level steps verified by fully automated model-checking. A key observati

plasma-cells

Lumbar-Spine

Conference proceedings 2001ods. CHARME 2001 is the 11th in a series of working conferences devoted to the development and use of leading-edge formal techniques and tools for the design and veri?cation of hardware and hardware-like systems. Previous events in the ‘CHARME’ series were held in Bad Herrenalb (1999), Montreal (199

BALK

Register Transformations with Multiple Clock Domainsheory enabling a wide range of register transformations relating to the multiple clock domains. For example, we can perform pipelining, phase abstraction, and retiming across clock domain boundaries. We believe our theory will be useful to extend current work on formal hardware design, synthesis, and verification to multiple-clock-domain systems.

Pandemic

faultfinder

Mark Hepworth,Siobhan Duvigneauon in the work is the need to explicitly address the issues of proof design and proof engineering, i.e. the process of creating proofs and the craft of structuring and formulating them, as concerns on their own right.

消瘦

Writing and Comparing Algorithms efficient implementation than a non-verified version. The approach is useful for guiding compiler implementations for Pebble and related languages such as VHDL; it may also form the basis for automating the generation of provably-correct tools for hardware development.