找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Constructivism in Science Education; A Philosophical Exam Michael R. Matthews Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 cons

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 34822|回復(fù): 51
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:21:04 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education
副標(biāo)題A Philosophical Exam
編輯Michael R. Matthews
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/237/236139/236139.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Constructivism in Science Education; A Philosophical Exam Michael R. Matthews Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 cons
描述Constructivism is one of the most influential theories incontemporary education and learning theory. It has had great influencein science education. The papers in this collection represent,arguably, the most sustained examination of the theoretical andphilosophical foundations of constructivism yet published. .Topics covered include: orthodox epistemology and the philosophicaltraditions of constructivism; the relationship of epistemology tolearning theory; the connection between philosophy and pedagogy inconstructivist practice; the difference between radical and socialconstructivism, and an appraisal of their epistemology; the strengthsand weaknesses of the Strong Programme in the sociology of science andimplications for science education. The book contains an extensivebibliography. .Contributors include philosophers of science, philosophers ofeducation, science educators, and cognitive scientists. The book isnoteworthy for bringing this diverse range of disciplines together inthe examination of a central educational topic.
出版日期Book 1998
關(guān)鍵詞constructivism; education; objectivity; science; science education; sociology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5032-3
isbn_softcover978-0-7923-4924-2
isbn_ebook978-94-011-5032-3
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education被引頻次




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education年度引用




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education讀者反饋




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:24:04 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:23:09 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:51:25 | 只看該作者
Jürgen Hampel,Andreas Klinke,Ortwin Renne concepts, positions and arguments for the latter than is immediately available in the paper. Part II discusses the problem of intersubjectivity in constructivism. The general conclusions drawn from these sections is that the basic concepts and theses of constructivism are, mostly, at best very obs
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:30:00 | 只看該作者
Robert Backhaus,Gerald Braun,Stefan Weiersply confused, should be devastated, if not silenced for ever. But the circumstances in the case at hand are not ordinary. W. A. Suchting calls his effort . and within the first six pages he provides an instructive example of his very own method of deconstruction. Though the traditional philosopher’s
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:31:33 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:15:42 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:35:23 | 只看該作者
Analyse der Unternehmenspotenziale,c knowledge. This paper offers a critical examination of some of the basic claims of this branch of science studies and argues that social constructivists cannot explain some of the most characteristic features of the physical sciences. The implications of social constructivism for science education
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:48:21 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:07:19 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55893-1upon the rationale and practice of science teaching. It is maintained that if the claims of SSK are true then there are serious, and educationally and culturally deleterious, implications which follow. The two articles will argue that, fortunately, the claims of SSK for the external causation of sci
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-2-1 13:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
定陶县| 桓台县| 黄陵县| 麻江县| 淳化县| 达日县| 平泉县| 张家口市| 樟树市| 宜城市| 海晏县| 陆丰市| 隆回县| 旌德县| 尼勒克县| 巴林左旗| 凤庆县| 广平县| 武强县| 宜州市| 平陆县| 来凤县| 黄浦区| 蒙阴县| 托克逊县| 青河县| 溧水县| 正阳县| 屯昌县| 舟山市| 珠海市| 罗山县| 清苑县| 孟津县| 漳浦县| 漳平市| 合肥市| 固镇县| 高阳县| 屏东县| 唐山市|