找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education; Restoring Continuity Lauri V?kev? Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 18418|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:42:25 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education
副標(biāo)題Restoring Continuity
編輯Lauri V?kev?
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/236/235814/235814.mp4
概述Presents a case for cultural naturalist philosophy in art(s) education.Provides an example of late modern philosophizing in the field of art(s) education.Suggests a naturalist critical reading of Dewe
叢書名稱Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education
圖書封面Titlebook: Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education; Restoring Continuity Lauri V?kev? Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if
描述.This book makes a case for cultural naturalism as a basis for a philosophy of art education. It argues for a holistic approach that avoids hard boundaries between artistic disciplines in the educational context, applying cultural naturalism to challenges that are topical for the whole art(s) education field, including challenges related to ecology, social justice, and technological transformation of culture.?.The book is written in the form of a conditional argument that considers the consequences of cultural naturalism for today’s philosophical problem-solving in art(s) education. It contains a systematic and historical analysis of cultural naturalism that support the philosophical reflection of educators and other scholars operative in this field. The result is a late modern reading of Deweyan cultural naturalism that highlights the continuance of key philosophical ideas from the modern to present discourses. The key topics discussed are of particular interest to present-day art(s) educators: ecological sustainability, social justice, and technological transformation of culture. In addition, this book provides an example of pragmatist argumentation, suggesting an alternative to
出版日期Book 2023
關(guān)鍵詞Education in the arts; Philosophy of art education; Classical pragmatism; Cultural naturalism; Education
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38817-0
isbn_softcover978-3-031-38819-4
isbn_ebook978-3-031-38817-0Series ISSN 1573-4528 Series E-ISSN 2214-0069
issn_series 1573-4528
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education被引頻次




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education年度引用




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education讀者反饋




書目名稱Considering Deweyan Cultural Naturalism as a Philosophy of Art(s) Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:08:56 | 只看該作者
Zhaohui Yang,Hossein Haeri,Kshitij Jerath criticisms of philosophical modernity and non-naturalist arguments. Philosophical naturalism is revealed to have worked along with several lines of inquiry, getting a push from the positivism critique of the late analytical philosophy, and fostering the return of pragmatist ideas to academic philos
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:34:32 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:47:56 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:43:42 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:26:51 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:09:52 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:06:57 | 只看該作者
Locating Cultural Naturalism, criticisms of philosophical modernity and non-naturalist arguments. Philosophical naturalism is revealed to have worked along with several lines of inquiry, getting a push from the positivism critique of the late analytical philosophy, and fostering the return of pragmatist ideas to academic philosophical discourses.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:33:12 | 只看該作者
Lauri V?kev?Presents a case for cultural naturalist philosophy in art(s) education.Provides an example of late modern philosophizing in the field of art(s) education.Suggests a naturalist critical reading of Dewe
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:15:40 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 21:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
汝阳县| 阿拉尔市| 浦江县| 泗水县| 淮南市| 牙克石市| 沙河市| 海安县| 阳高县| 壶关县| 佳木斯市| 西盟| 鹤山市| 历史| 巴彦淖尔市| 三都| 自贡市| 南雄市| 竹溪县| 尼玛县| 崇礼县| 北流市| 游戏| 威海市| 都江堰市| 辽阳市| 兴化市| 麟游县| 阳新县| 钦州市| 屏山县| 佛坪县| 凌源市| 南丰县| 广南县| 汤原县| 年辖:市辖区| 焦作市| 柳江县| 思茅市| 江北区|