找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses; Examining Judiciary H. Chris Tecklenburg Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[復制鏈接]
查看: 43084|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:46:42 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses
副標題Examining Judiciary
編輯H. Chris Tecklenburg
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/236/235533/235533.mp4
概述Performs a bicameral analysis of court curbing and court structuring legislation over time.Examines court curbing and court structuring legislation from the perspective of the judiciary committees.Ana
圖書封面Titlebook: Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses; Examining Judiciary  H. Chris Tecklenburg Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The
描述.This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary..
出版日期Book 2020
關鍵詞judicial politics; judiciary committee; US Congress; House of Representatives; US Senate; court curbing; b
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44379-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-44405-1
isbn_ebook978-3-030-44379-5
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses網絡公開度




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses被引頻次




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses年度引用




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses讀者反饋




書目名稱Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:17:43 | 只看該作者
Book 2020analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary..
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:47:47 | 只看該作者
Conclusions Involving the Relationship Between Congress and the Courts,bicameral behavior is offered next, which presents a comparison between the House and Senate results. Further areas to examine are then presented, followed by a brief account of the future relationship between Congress and the Courts.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:15:13 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:51:19 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:02:36 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:38:17 | 只看該作者
Reported Court Curbing and Administrative Court Curbing Measures,e quantitative results, which reveal that in general the House responds to polarization, while the Senate responds to the Court’s agenda, and judicial review. Interestingly, administrative court curbing, which are attempts by Congress to insulate the executive from judicial review, reveal similar outcomes.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:37:14 | 只看該作者
Reported Court Structuring Bills,ring ideologically divisive times with the Court. An alternate explanation is that Congress may add judges and/or courts based on the administrative needs of the federal judiciary. The quantitative results support the ideological/partisan explanation.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:02:31 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:00:55 | 只看該作者
slation from the perspective of the judiciary committees.Ana.This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-21 23:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
汝城县| 左贡县| 大同县| 彭水| 呼玛县| 专栏| 八宿县| 德清县| 钟山县| 晋中市| 巩义市| 晋中市| 厦门市| 元谋县| 承德市| 贵定县| 磴口县| 九龙坡区| 津南区| 韶山市| 东至县| 新沂市| 资兴市| 山阳县| 衡水市| 云南省| 晋中市| 图们市| 广水市| 德昌县| 大厂| 垣曲县| 北安市| 阜阳市| 丰都县| 玛沁县| 花莲县| 麻江县| 平顶山市| 扶绥县| 库车县|