Titlebook: Conflicts in Curriculum Theory; Challenging Hegemoni Jo?o M. Paraskeva Book 2021Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

FER

Needlework

責(zé)問(wèn)

Mania Pavella,Damien Ernst,Daniel Ruiz-Vegals, it champions the notion of “epistemicide”—the killing of knowledge—in the field and argues for the need to challenge the dominant—i.e., Modern Western Eurocentric—epistemologies. The chapter also introduces a new theoretical approach—itinerant curriculum theory—an alternative way to think and to

無(wú)孔

雪白

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4145-1efinition of education and the lethal consequences of a field under the yoke of learning and behavioral pedagogies. It also unpacks the limitations within particular counter-hegemonic approaches—i.e., political economy and autobiographical—dissects the epistemicidal nature of our field and its compl

使迷醉

無(wú)關(guān)緊要

narcotic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4145-1ntially, the research lens for qualitative approaches. In this context, the chapter examines curriculum as scandal, a lethal ideological device produces an epistemicide—the killing of knowledge—epistemological havoc cooked up daily in the process of qualitative studies promoting and legitimizing a specific modern Western Eurocentric episteme.