Titlebook: Conciliatory Democracy; From Deliberation To Martin Ebeling Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Jean-Jacques Rou

consent

充氣女

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2193-5g over citizens, the general ambitiousness of its epistemic claims, and recapitulates how the argument for the conciliatory conception embeds an epistemic claim in the normative framework of deliberative democracy. Furthermore, it discusses how the ideal of conciliatory democracy can bear on non-ide

Conquest

EVEN

鉤針織物

The Epistemic Authority of Citizens, regard each other as equal epistemic authorities on justice, that is, as prima facie equally reliable judges of the rightness of political decisions according to a procedure-independent criterion of rightness. The conditions of deliberative democracy are widespread decentered deliberation about com

前面

The Epistemology of Political Disagreement, sets out to answer the question of how citizens ought to react to their political disagreements with other citizens whom they regard as equal epistemic authorities on justice. To this end, the chapter introduces the debate about the epistemology of peer disagreement. It explains the dialectic betwe

散開(kāi)

Conciliatory Democracy,pplication of the ideal to political issues. On the one hand, controversies about abortion seemingly offer little room for epistemic conciliation as they address an “either/or” conflict about its permissibility. A more detailed look at the issues involved, however, lays bare a number of dimensions a

免費(fèi)

Representative Democracy and the Role of Political Parties,mes to the fore. Anthony Downs’s theory of multiparty electoral competition is rightly associated with an elitist strand of political theory. Downs argues that party elites tailor political platforms to the preferences of median voters in order to capture positions in government. As it stands, this

epicondylitis

Connecting the Dots,g over citizens, the general ambitiousness of its epistemic claims, and recapitulates how the argument for the conciliatory conception embeds an epistemic claim in the normative framework of deliberative democracy. Furthermore, it discusses how the ideal of conciliatory democracy can bear on non-ide

Cursory