Titlebook: Computer Simulation Validation; Fundamental Concepts Claus Beisbart,Nicole J. Saam Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Computer S

蹣跚

Cursory

condone

The Concept of Judgment in Montaigne natural answers to the questions as well as arguments that speak in favor and against these answers. The aim is to obtain a better understanding of the options we have for defining validation and how they are related to each other.

正常

fluffy

glomeruli

Ethical Knowledge and Social Factsnceptual model is credible. But the impact of this prior credibility is indirect since simulations at best provide partial and approximate solutions to the conceptual model. Fortunately, this gap between the simulations and the conceptual model can be addressed using what we call Bayesian verificati

一起平行

Analytical and/or Dialectical Thinking’s mild relativism with respect to theory choice? I argue that there is no need to worry about relativism with respect to computer simulations, in particular. (3) The field of social simulations, in particular, still lacks a common understanding concerning the requirements of empirical validation of

jettison

Physics and Matter in the Nineteenth Centuryls are never by themselves credible ., but acquire credibility within a given context of inquiry, which itself depends on the cognitive interests of the inquirer. Judgments concerning the credibility of a conceptual model thus need to be based partly on a characterization of the intrinsic features o

少量

參考書(shū)目

Introduction: Computer Simulation Validation, steps needed during validation, provide best practice examples, reflect upon challenges to validation, and put validation in a broader perspective. As we suggest in our outlook, the validation of computer simulations will remain an important research topic that needs cross- and interdisciplinary ef