Titlebook: Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems; 14th International W Jo?o Leite,Tran Cao Son,Stefan Woltran Conference proceedings 2013 Springe

越自我

陳腐的人

Analyzing the Equivalence Zoo in Abstract Argumentation,pecifically, we establish a number of new results about the relationships among various equivalence notions for Dung argumentation frameworks which are located between strong equivalence [1] and standard equivalence. We provide the complete picture for this variety of equivalence relations (which we call the .) for the most important semantics.

延期

熒光

Conference proceedings 2013ose of the CLIMA workshops is to provide a forum for discussing techniques, based on computational logic, for representing, programming and reasoning about agents and multi-agent systems in a formal way. This edition will feature two special sessions: Argumentation Technologies and Norms and Normative Multi-Agent Systems.

peritonitis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3128-2 a more flexible way of expressing arguments, which also simplifies their identification. This generic representation implies that argumentation theory may benefit from incorporating techniques of proof theory and that different non-classical formalisms may be used for backing up intended argumentation semantics.

大猩猩

Verbrechen und Geisteskrankheit,ct inconsistencies in the set of strict inference rules and cyclic (strict and defeasible) supports amongst literals. We also show that the translation involves at most a quadratic blowup and is therefore effectively and efficiently computable.

預知

A Sequent-Based Representation of Logical Argumentation, a more flexible way of expressing arguments, which also simplifies their identification. This generic representation implies that argumentation theory may benefit from incorporating techniques of proof theory and that different non-classical formalisms may be used for backing up intended argumentation semantics.

女上癮

動機

conspicuous

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29725-4age arguments composed by premises and a conclusion. In particular, we analyze how argumentation schemes fit into the discourse relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank and which are the argumentation schemes which emerge from this natural language corpus.