找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Asphyxia
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:47:18 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 22:31:48 | 只看該作者
The Immunotracing of Keratinocyte Subsetshe discusses the idea of a ‘just peace,’ he rejects the claim that peace is a mere precondition for justice and not a value of its own, and he rejects the idea that realizing justice is necessary for achieving sufficiently stable peace.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:59:37 | 只看該作者
The Fibrous Proteins of the Epidermisaffairs of freely associated groups. Wendt argues that this is not the conception of peace we should adopt if we want a conception of peace that is feasible without moral consensus, something that allows us to live together in the face of moral disagreement.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:51:14 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:07:45 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907hese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:23:42 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907t the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 18:14:00 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:31:22 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907 moral evaluation. They thus provide moral reasons to make compromises. He also discusses what kind of moral reasons these are, he says a few words on other second-level values, and he discusses one of Simon May’s arguments against principled reasons to compromise in politics.
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 00:16:39 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78884-0 consent, and, second, on whether the other party to the compromise violated basic moral rights in order to get one’s consent, or threatened to violate basic moral rights. When consent is not genuine, there is no genuine compromise as well.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:37:16 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 10:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
高唐县| 崇州市| 乌兰浩特市| 正安县| 玉山县| 布尔津县| 灌云县| 梅河口市| 平远县| 喀喇沁旗| 延庆县| 潍坊市| 土默特右旗| 锡林郭勒盟| 澎湖县| 峨眉山市| 临泉县| 肃北| 大田县| 中西区| 柏乡县| 上高县| 波密县| 句容市| 宜宾县| 巨鹿县| 铁力市| 施秉县| 永济市| 永丰县| 平凉市| 江都市| 阿拉善右旗| 南通市| 恩平市| 岑溪市| 陇川县| 灵台县| 巩义市| 余干县| 张家口市|