Titlebook: Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in Europe; Governance, Resistan Jim Buller,P?nar E. D?nmez,Matthew Wood Book 2019 The Editor(s)

Glucocorticoids

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80898-2appointment under the “Who?” model, so the movement’s demands were easier to identify; (2) tagging on various claims, so that the demands were more comprehensive; (3) connecting the “Who” question to more long-standing dissatisfactions in society, so that the demands were more durable; and (4) humou

MUT

Grundtatsachen der ebenen Spannungsoptik,riptive about politics. This is problematic because the “post-political city” has become something of a label for the lack of politics in and about the city. We conclude the piece by proposing ways of realigning the field of enquiry. Our fundamental concern throughout is epistemological: when we loo

Analogy

裝飾

追逐

Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in EuropeGovernance, Resistan

壁畫

Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in Europe978-3-319-64236-9

文件夾

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64236-9Depoliticisation in Europe; Representative democracy; Anti-Politics in Europe; Post-Politics; European g

偉大

Synchronism

overture

Fehleranalyse und Datenreduktion, that more attention needs to be paid to the ideological/structural character of this tendency. Following a critical analysis of Colin Hay’s linear model of (de)politicisation, it provides a structural explanation for (de)politicisation dynamics through a philosophical engagement with Michel Foucaul