找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Common Law – Civil Law; The Great Divide? Nicoletta Bersier,Christoph Bezemek,Frederick Scha Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 相持不下
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 22:52:32 | 只看該作者
Tree Diagram or Pyramid of Norms?,For Joseph Raz, the hierarchical structure of legal orders may be described more appropriately using?a tree diagram than the model of a pyramid of norms. This view is tested in this chapter, paying particular attention to the differences between civil law and common law.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:38:41 | 只看該作者
1572-4395 s approaching the topic against the background of different This book offers an in-depth analysis of the differences between common law and civil law systems from various theoretical perspectives. Written by a global network of experts, it explores the topic against the background of a variety of le
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:21:33 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 11:28:34 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0664-0nary approaches, the civil law tradition appears to be still committed to the “science of law”. It is argued that, in the context of the latter, the moment of transcendence is the preserve of the philosophy of law.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 15:39:56 | 只看該作者
Introduction,outhpiece in applying them. Perceived in this manner, common law and civil law differ as to the (main) source(s) of law, about who is to create, about who is (merely) to draw from them, about whether the law works itself pure each step of the way or whether the law’s purity may only be tarnished when confronted with a contingent set of facts.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:10:22 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:54:55 | 只看該作者
Book 2022global network of experts, it explores the topic against the background of a variety of legal traditions..Common law and civil law are typically presented as antagonistic players on a field claimed by diverse legal systems: the former being based on precedent set by judges in deciding cases before t
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:21:49 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1622-8of . and . in adjudication—therefore, debating the construction of judicial adjudication as . and as .—, the essay proposes an understanding of . not only as an effective ., but also—and mostly—as a methodologically constitutive juridical criterion, emphasizing a normatively constitutive . (.).
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:15:16 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:29:23 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-16 16:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
广水市| 巢湖市| 沂源县| 兴义市| 田林县| 元谋县| 潢川县| 青岛市| 襄垣县| 西吉县| 中西区| 高台县| 招远市| 兴义市| 偏关县| 孝昌县| 重庆市| 顺义区| 临邑县| 云霄县| 鹿泉市| 慈利县| 鞍山市| 井研县| 威宁| 兴城市| 永福县| 新源县| 吉林省| 逊克县| 襄樊市| 平果县| 清徐县| 温州市| 郧西县| 石门县| 海阳市| 金寨县| 沅江市| 资溪县| 信阳市|