Titlebook: Coming to Terms with Superdiversity; The Case of Rotterda Peter Scholten,Maurice Crul,Paul van de Laar Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019 The Editor(s) (if

不可知論

圍巾

exercise

indemnify

Epilogue: What’s the Matter with Rotterdam?tive reactions to diversity, substantial voting for rightwing, anti-immigrant parties, and an ‘unhappy version’ of super-diversity in which the growth of a disapproving atmosphere has led to sharper ethnic boundaries, retreat into white enclaves, and low levels of white-ethnic minority social contac

jaunty

Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019terdam, as is true for many post-industrial cities, has seen a considerable backlash against migration and diversity: the populist party Leefbaar Rotterdam of the late Pim Fortuyn is already for many years the largest party in the city. At the same time Rotterdam has become a majority minority city

休息

沒(méi)花的是打擾

Chee Wei Phang,Atreyi Kankanhalli group in the working class. An intersectional approach in which generation, socio-economic position and ethnicity all play a role seems to be much more appropriate than an approach looking at ethnic groups alone. It is exactly the increased diversity within ethnic groups that underscores the concept of superdiversity for cities like Rotterdam.

系列

傲慢物

DECRY

Predicting Global Well-Being: Ithis change of power. From an international perspective, this case sheds light on the question whether and how a populist/anti-establishment party can succeed to not only win elections, but to implement policy. Liveable Rotterdam was part of Rotterdam government from 2002 to 2006 (and became part of it again in 2014).