找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Codetermination; A Discussion of Diff Hans G. Nutzinger,Jürgen Backhaus Book 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1989 human capital.in

[復制鏈接]
樓主: fitful
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:09:56 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:09:28 | 只看該作者
Chris Hicks,Vasilios Mavroudis,Jon Crowcrofthese create first mover advantages (Schelling 1960), which explains why capital favors collective bargaining over codetermination. Furthermore, these first mover advantages create inefficiencies of the prisoners’ dilemma type: management will take into account that its decisions, regarding investmen
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:37:11 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 18:41:00 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:49:53 | 只看該作者
Deciding a Fragment of ,-Privacyier regulations before World War II, it comprises nowadays almost one century. The idea of codetermination whose ambiguity and vagueness will be discussed in one of the following subsections is, broadly speaking, more or less accepted in the Federal Republic of Germany; the existing legal regulation
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:33:37 | 只看該作者
Laouen Fernet,Sebastian M?dersheimoints and, by reference to recent empirical work on producer (industrial/worker) cooperatives and British retail cooperatives (in which there are worker directors), I will show how these arguments have broader applicability.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:04:48 | 只看該作者
Laouen Fernet,Sebastian M?dersheims managerial philosophies set the context of codetermination and its consequences. It is therefore hard to forecast what course codetermination will take, although no genuinely new points of departure have emerged in current developments.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:15:44 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91859-0thors have to say comports with my understanding of what happened. In as much as my expertise in that history is negligible, I have no critique to offer. The second is a summary of the initiative, or proposal, advanced by DGB in 1982. I am not certain why this proposal was chosen for presentation: A
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:43:01 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:57:40 | 只看該作者
Simone Raponi,Roberto Di Pietroirm” can be applied to analyze a policy proposal. What passed, before 1970, under the name of theory of the firm was really “price theory”. The “firm” was simply the interface between two sets of markets (factor markets and product markets). In the intervening period, however, the “new institutional
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-26 22:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
双牌县| 渝中区| 西盟| 海淀区| 新乡县| 佳木斯市| 桑植县| 木兰县| 西贡区| 桐城市| 米林县| 乌审旗| 罗山县| 乌鲁木齐县| 博乐市| 崇义县| 余庆县| 大同县| 凤山县| 永州市| 安岳县| 阿克| 武宁县| 罗定市| 麻栗坡县| 师宗县| 花莲市| 新乐市| 舟山市| 嘉荫县| 邵东县| 商都县| 抚顺市| 山西省| 冀州市| 霸州市| 东丽区| 股票| 翼城县| 惠东县| 安岳县|