找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal; Proceedings of the F Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard Conference proceedings 197

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: EVOKE
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:43:55 | 只看該作者
Comments on Pellegrino’s ‘Anatomy of Clinical Judgments’ctic, ethics, art and rhetoric” in the spirit of the Aristotelian division of the sciences, a division, in my view, almost wholly inappropriate, in the terms in which Aristotle made it, to any modern philosophical discussion of the nature of science or disciplines like clinical medicine that exist i
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:11:37 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:31:04 | 只看該作者
of interest to engage philosophers. By making the structure of medical reasoning more apparent to its users, philosophers can show health care practitioners how better to master clinical judgment and how better to focus it towards the goods and values medicine wishes to pursue. Becoming clearer about the pro978-94-009-9401-0978-94-009-9399-0
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:29:00 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612587rom an information-processing perspective, and second, by critically examining the research model that produced this finding My concern will be, then, with the psychological processes of clinical judgment and with ascertaining what research on clinical judgment has actually studied. The overall thru
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:17:15 | 只看該作者
Russia‘s Oil Barons and Metal Magnatesctic, ethics, art and rhetoric” in the spirit of the Aristotelian division of the sciences, a division, in my view, almost wholly inappropriate, in the terms in which Aristotle made it, to any modern philosophical discussion of the nature of science or disciplines like clinical medicine that exist i
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:49:37 | 只看該作者
framed in medicine and how choices of treatment are made. We hope it will afford the reader, whether layman, physician or philosopher, a useful perspective on the process of knowing what occurs in medicine; and that the results of the dis- cussions at the Fifth Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine w
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:24:22 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:12:35 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:49:52 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409300 by Eric Cassell in his ‘The Subjective in Clinical Judgment’ [1] are not philosophical in nature. Rather, they take the form of a general essay in psychology; and so my comments on Dr. Cassell’s discussion of them will be from one in the position of an outsider looking in.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 11:13:33 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 16:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
莆田市| 麻城市| 桐城市| 南溪县| 东山县| 三明市| 铜陵市| 石首市| 灵石县| 诏安县| 洛南县| 云安县| 葫芦岛市| 祁连县| 大方县| 枣庄市| 朝阳区| 沂南县| 留坝县| 金坛市| 溆浦县| 伊宁市| 武邑县| 绍兴县| 开封市| 江达县| 和硕县| 阳原县| 灌南县| 桦川县| 黎川县| 建瓯市| 萝北县| 庆安县| 渭南市| 定西市| 轮台县| 丘北县| 福贡县| 茶陵县| 从化市|