找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: China’s Grain for Green Program; A Review of the Larg Claudio O. Delang,Zhen Yuan Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 和尚吃肉片
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:30:26 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:32:22 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:55:16 | 只看該作者
Einleitung und Gang der Untersuchung,crease in grain prices, was more likely due to the loss of farmland caused by urbanization in the eastern provinces (where the Grain for Green was not implemented), as well as the shift from grain production to the production of other crops.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:39:06 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9998-6chers agree that economic trees bring higher profits to the farmers, but even among economic trees, not all trees bring profits comparable to crops, once the subsidies are excluded from the calculation. Most researchers have looked at the benefits per hectare rather than the benefits per person-day.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:11:34 | 只看該作者
China’s Reforestation and Rural Development Programsn provinces was reaching a critical point. The Grain for Green in particular addressed all these problems concurrently, through direct payments to poor farmers willing to set aside marginal land. Partly for this reason, the Grain for Green is considered by many as the best reforestation and rural development program ever undertaken in China.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:57:50 | 只看該作者
Impact on Grain Output and Pricecrease in grain prices, was more likely due to the loss of farmland caused by urbanization in the eastern provinces (where the Grain for Green was not implemented), as well as the shift from grain production to the production of other crops.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 18:46:57 | 只看該作者
Participants’ Income Levelschers agree that economic trees bring higher profits to the farmers, but even among economic trees, not all trees bring profits comparable to crops, once the subsidies are excluded from the calculation. Most researchers have looked at the benefits per hectare rather than the benefits per person-day.
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:14:07 | 只看該作者
Management of Forest Resources from 1949 to 1998Until 1949 there was not even a Ministry of Forestry, with the forests being managed by the Ministry of Agriculture. The communist government did try to use forests more rationally, by instituting the first national-level Ministry of Forestry (MOF). However, the MOF was not able to manage the forest
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:05:27 | 只看該作者
China’s Reforestation and Rural Development Programser 97 % of China’s counties and target over 100 million ha of land for forestation. The Grain for Green is the largest of these programs, in terms of area covered, people affected, and money invested. This book only reviews the Grain for Green, but in many villages more than one program was introduc
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:48:19 | 只看該作者
Program Timelinees – Sichuan, Shaanxi and Gansu – in 1999. In particular, the Grain for Green was slowed down after 2003 because of fear (later found to be unfounded) over the impact that the Grain for Green had had on food supply, and because more land had been converted over the previous 2–3 years than originally
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-27 11:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宝丰县| 固安县| 南乐县| 扶绥县| 揭阳市| 永靖县| 临颍县| 宁安市| 永康市| 阿图什市| 永清县| 新昌县| 宝应县| 革吉县| 宜川县| 城步| 大冶市| 无极县| 上蔡县| 阿合奇县| 宿迁市| 临武县| 顺义区| 华容县| 泌阳县| 七台河市| 勐海县| 呼和浩特市| 嘉善县| 大悟县| 麻栗坡县| 宽甸| 马公市| 临汾市| 东山县| 麻城市| 连江县| 胶南市| 舞阳县| 通榆县| 宁安市|