Titlebook: China and the Global Political Economy; Shaun Breslin Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013 economy.globali

GUAFF

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)China and the Global Political Economy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Influx

神圣將軍

Magnificent

Book 2013This IPE Classic considers one of the most pressing issues of the Twenty-First century: the relationship between domestic configurations of power and globalized production processes in shaping the process and implications of China‘s re-engagement with the global economy.

急性

減弱不好

減弱不好

自負(fù)的人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-1709-2s worth remembering how difficult it was to get data and reliable information out of China for many years after 1949. The sort of information that is available on one visit to the web page of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (www.iwep.org.cn) wo

LATER

Frank Bruinsma,Eric Pels,Bert Weeossible with the domestic context of change, leaving policy towards the global economy and the international context to Chapter 3. It deploys a somewhat blunt tripartite periodisation of the reform period: 1978 to 1984 is characterised as a period of policy reformulation; 1984 to 1994 as abandoning

擦掉

Thomas de Graaff,Caroline Rodenburgt occasion, this engagement was a consequence of imperialism and the forced opening of China by military power. Re-engagement of the post Mao era had a shared feature with the first case — the international system was not of China’s making, Chinese elites did not accept the norms of the system, and