Titlebook: Chemistry of Learning; Invertebrate Researc W. C. Corning,S. C. Ratner Book 1967 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1967 chemistry.in

scrape

fallible

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6565-3chemistry; invertebrates; learning; research; Model invertebrates

忙碌

克制

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39311-2 themselves. Another track involves formulations, theories, about the processes involved in these behaviors. At different times in the history of this search for understanding, these two tracks have assumed different magnitudes and slopes, so the train of understanding has moved at different speeds

污點(diǎn)

epicardium

Anja Overgaard Thomassen,Charlotte Ringsmosertebrates, I have been interested in them for a long time. When I was with the Atomic Energy Commission, one of the first proposals which came across my desk was from Jim McConnell on planarian research. Considering the trouble that I had getting that proposal approved, I have had an interest in thi

耐寒

Julie Borup Jensen,S?ren Frimannlearning were of a psychological nature. In the last 20 years, however, biological approaches have achieved prominence. The earlier systematic treatments utilized neurological concepts as exemplified by Hebb’s system in 1949. Although Halstead (1951) and Katz and Halstead (1950) invoked a systematic

錫箔紙

Suraje Dessai,Kate Lonsdale,Rachel Harcourtular model has been called ., and it originated at Michigan State University in the early 1950’s. At that time it was an attempt to integrate the neobehavioristic theories of Hull, Guthrie, Skinner, and Tolman, plus the older ideas of Pavlov (Denny, 1966; Denny and Adelman, 1955).

nettle

intellect