Titlebook: Chaucerian Aesthetics; Peggy A. Knapp Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2008 aesthetics.Chaucer.language.Med

cucumber

書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics被引頻次




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics年度引用




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics讀者反饋




書目名稱Chaucerian Aesthetics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

FISC

Book 2008ugh aesthetic reflection has sometimes seemed out of sync with modern approaches to mind and language, Knapp defends its value in general and demonstrates its importance for the analysis of Chaucer s narrative art. Focusing on language games, persons, women, humor, and community, this book ponders what makes art beautiful.

騙子

不容置疑

蛛絲

Book 2008ent, sometimes divergent perspectives illuminate both the immediate pleasure of encountering beauty and its haunting promise of intelligibility. Although aesthetic reflection has sometimes seemed out of sync with modern approaches to mind and language, Knapp defends its value in general and demonstr

弓箭

2945-5936 mes congruent, sometimes divergent perspectives illuminate both the immediate pleasure of encountering beauty and its haunting promise of intelligibility. Although aesthetic reflection has sometimes seemed out of sync with modern approaches to mind and language, Knapp defends its value in general an

弓箭

The New Middle Ageshttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/224188.jpg

陳腐的人

集中營

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0154-0t introduced until Alexander Baumgarten’s . in 1750, nor made central to European thinking until Hume, Kant, Schiller, and Hegel took it up.. People who would not quibble with using the word . as an analytic category bearing on issues earlier than . appearance as a term in the eighteenth century, or

凌辱