Titlebook: Charles De Gaulle and the Media; Leadership, TV and t Riccardo Brizzi Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Charle

好忠告人

,Conclusion: The Origins of “Telecracy”? Some Final Reflections,public was accused of having exercised a suffocating monopoly on the audiovisual system. Though this can hardly be denied, it is important to note that this monopoly had strong roots in the past. Since 1944, the absolute monopoly of the State over radio and television had been enshrined in law. More

保全

招待

Odyssey

定點

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379992eral and the General’s extensive and continuous recourse to television—in particular, de Gaulle’s use of television in presenting his policies on national and international affairs, which served to encourage the perception among the French public that he alone was responsible for the destiny of the nation.

labile

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117112etween the élysée and Matignon that became visible in this period. De Gaulle’s misjudgements of the riots and his decision to maintain a low profile during the initial conflict is shown to have left a political vacuum that allowed the new Prime Minister, Georges Pompidou, to assert his authority and enact a shift in the balance of power.

fringe

FER

Political Control on Television,resident that was extremely “hands on” in managing the political uses of television, who jealously guarded the personal contact with the people that television allowed him and who was far from eager to allow other members of the executive the same privileged use he made of television.

Arable

Palatial

Leadership and Television: The General and Constitutional Development During the Fifth Republic,eral and the General’s extensive and continuous recourse to television—in particular, de Gaulle’s use of television in presenting his policies on national and international affairs, which served to encourage the perception among the French public that he alone was responsible for the destiny of the nation.