找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Cartesian Theodicy; Descartes’ Quest for Zbigniew Janowski Book 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000 René Descartes.epistemological problem

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: centipede
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:56:30 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 13:59:03 | 只看該作者
,Descartes — Reader of St. Augustine,background of Augustinian metaphysics is, however, tantamount to saying that there exists a genetic link between the two thinkers, not merely a conceptual resemblance. If so, it is natural to wonder whether Descartes in fact built and developed his metaphysics along the lines of St. Augustine’s theology.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:59:53 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:06:52 | 只看該作者
The , as Theodicy,were inconsistent with his goodness to have created me such that I am deceived all the time, it would seem equally foreign to his goodness to allow me to be deceived even occasionally; yet this last assertion cannot be made.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:44:06 | 只看該作者
Introduction,Yet there is no term that better captures both Descartes’ intention and the overarching argument in the .. Surprisingly enough, with the exception of Sergio Landucci’s study . in which he discusses theodicies of several seventeenth-century thinkers, the . have never been interpreted as theodicy. The
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:45:59 | 只看該作者
The , as Theodicy,at he has not brought it about that there is no earth, no sky, no extended thing, no shape, no size, no place, while at the same time ensuring that all these things appear to me to exist just as they do now? What is more, since I sometimes believe that others go astray in cases where they think they
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:44:36 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:08:15 | 只看該作者
Human Freedom,ointed out that the two accounts are incompatible and I suggested that the account in the Fourth Meditation is a revision of the account in the First Meditation. It is time now to ask why Descartes returns to this question only in the Fourth Meditation.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:25:56 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:19:23 | 只看該作者
,How Rational is Descartes’ Rationalism?,ng the place of Aristotelian philosophy, but of providing a philosophy that satisfies the demands of Christian religion. To say this is of course tantamount to claiming that Scholasticism did not fulfill this task. Strange as it sounds, this is what Descartes sincerely believed.. What was wrong with
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 13:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
思茅市| 如皋市| 和龙市| 且末县| 景德镇市| 义马市| 锦州市| 盐亭县| 磐安县| 斗六市| 独山县| 莱芜市| 太白县| 闽侯县| 双柏县| 邓州市| 濉溪县| 北票市| 沐川县| 肃宁县| 宁波市| 醴陵市| 台中市| 额济纳旗| 合作市| 鄱阳县| 灌阳县| 辽阳县| 德令哈市| 卢氏县| 分宜县| 逊克县| 介休市| 中阳县| 左云县| 隆德县| 枣强县| 霍州市| 扎囊县| 平舆县| 哈尔滨市|