Titlebook: CONCUR ‘90: Theories of Concurrency: Unification and Extension; Theories of Concurre J. C. M. Baeten,J. W. Klop Conference proceedings 1990

短程旅游

Conference proceedings 1990 the different approaches to algebraic concurrency theory, and to develop a formalism applicable to a wide range of case studies. The articles in this volume describe the state of the art in concurrency, the theory of communicating concurrent (or distributed) systems.

決定性

Bombazine Dolls and Orders from the Dead,em of RCCS with respect to the implementation mapping, we induce also a "true concurrent" semantics for RCCS. These results are developed in the framework of "graphs with algebraic structure" as explained in [MM88, DMM89, MY89, F90, FM90, Co90].

織布機

舔食

Nqobizitha Ndlovu,Enyinna S. Nwauche (T-graphs, respectively) can be characterized without using the reduction rules by their P- and T-components. The two classes are not disjoint; systems in the intersection of the classes can be reduced to a unique systems with only two elements.

神圣在玷污

Conference proceedings 1990heories of Concurrency: Unification and Extension), started in September 1989. The principal aims of the action are to explore the relationships among the different approaches to algebraic concurrency theory, and to develop a formalism applicable to a wide range of case studies. The articles in this

圣人

ALIAS

anthropologist

粘

Ideal specification formalism = expressivity + compositionality + decidability + testability + ...,compositionality. We apply these criteria to a number of specification formalisms ranging from behavioural formalisms (based on labelled transition systems) to logical formalisms (based on Hennessy-Milner logic). A main result of the paper is that a specification formalism must be at least as expres

不能根除

,An axiomatization of Lamport’s temporal logic of actions, logic of actions, and it seems worthwhile to search for axiomatizations of some of them as well..The simplest extension consists in adding formulas of the form [.]..,...,.. to the logic; this yields the general temporal logic of actions. Roughly, [.]..,...,.. says that the action . will take place