Titlebook: CETA‘s Investment Chapter; A Rule of Law Perspe Kriton Dionysiou Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

推崇

Procedural Fairness and CETA: Ghosts of Decades Past,he system’s . nature. This chapter seeks to evaluate whether the institutional safeguards in CETA have the potential to ensure procedural fairness during the arbitration proceedings. Although that the contracting parties to CETA have put in place concrete provisions to ensure procedural fairness, th

職業(yè)

Transparency and Access to Justice in CETA: Issues and Shortcomings,he potential to ease the tension between the public law nature of investment disputes and the lack of transparency in investment arbitration. The same cannot be argued, however, with respect to access to justice concerns as the parties have missed an important opportunity to confront these pressing

Bombast

Conclusion,ty-appointed mechanisms of investment arbitration, raises further concerns about the integrity of the proceedings. The second chapter indicates that these features are rooted in history and the private law foundations of investment arbitration.

羊齒

Infusion

amputation

llibretto

Personal Identity: What’s the Problem?he drafting of the investment standards in CETA, the binding interpretative rules, the joint interpretative declarations, the provisions aiming to address the phenomenon of conflicting awards and multiple proceedings, including the appellate mechanism attached to the ISDS mechanism in CETA. The chap

FRAUD

抵消

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400932he system’s . nature. This chapter seeks to evaluate whether the institutional safeguards in CETA have the potential to ensure procedural fairness during the arbitration proceedings. Although that the contracting parties to CETA have put in place concrete provisions to ensure procedural fairness, th

Harridan